Nov. 29 2007
The Valley Free Press reports that the town of Plano is considering penalizing prosperity, Catholics, Mormons and the Full Quiver movement. Do homeschoolers get a refund?
Alderman Shari Riddle said she would rather keep the district small than not have enough funds for the schools. She added families moving in with more children should pay more for the schools.
School Superintendent Laurie Walker defended the proposal.“We’re not making a profit. We’re just trying to pay the bills,” she said. “I don’t know what kind of effect it has on the market. I’m not a developer. I’m an educator.”
Nov. 28 2007
I encourage you to add this blog to your blog reader. You are using a reader I hope!
Also, watch the video below. I wish I could say this is shocking. I can’t believe it has only been viewed 512 times.
Technorati Tags: Government, Leviathan, Injustice
Nov. 28 2007
If I had the means I would buy a copy of this movie for every Christian parent I know. If you have a daughter and you want to be challenged with a counter-cultural vision of her future please see this movie. I am not profiting from the sale of this movie but you will!
“The Return of the Daughters” premiered at the 2007 San Antonio Independent Christian Film Festival (SAICFF) to a standing ovation and my wife and I were among those standing. I encourage all parents to see this movie (cost $20) . As a father of three I have had to think carefully about many of the cultural practices we blindly accept and the impact these decisions have on my family. This movie offers us portraits of families who have challenged cultural norms and have instead found beautiful alternatives. Click the link to purchase or learn more about the movie.
A few thoughts…
- The movie is very well crafted. Five families are profiled. They demonstrate that keeping your daughters at home is not only a viable option but an option that bears much fruit.
- The movie does an effective job of responding to many of the potential critics.
- For families that want to foster a multi-generational vision I see this as a foundational aspect for success.
- Voddie Baucham and his daughter are powerful and articulate spokesmen for this position. Pray for this man, his family, and everyone featured in this movie. If anyone of them falls they will be dragged out for all to see.
- I can’t wait to see what the movie the Botkin family does next!
If you want to get a taste of Voddie see my other posts tagged Voddie Baucham.
Nov. 27 2007
I am a bit of a techie and I have been thinking about ways in which a number of products I love could more easily be marketed to a wider audience. For example, I love the movie ‘A Journey Home‘ (I will write a review soon and tell you why). I would like to see this put in the hands of more families. I have just glanced at this announcement by Mark Cuban about ‘Radical Buy’ but this is just the sort of idea that has been running around in my head lately. Hopefully it won’t be limited to just Facebook.
Ideally I should be able to find products from parties A, B and C. Then I should be capable of going out and working to get these products listed on web locations X, Y and Z. I should have the option of working out different payment schemes for all parties to include even paying for the ads to be placed myself. This should all be very easy to do. So the idea of supporting a middleman should still exist. Hopefully Cuban is already thinking this way, if not maybe he will stumble across this post and steal my idea, I only humbly request 5 tickets to a Mavs game in less than lame seating. Perhaps this is all already possible, I will go back and check out the details later.
Technorati Tags: Mark Cuban, Web 2.0, Marketing, Business Ideas
Nov. 27 2007
Short and enlightening article about just who and who isn’t in the top 1% of earners.
Source: Greg Mankiw
Technorati Tags: Economics, Thomas Sowell
Nov. 25 2007
Reforming My Mind has a post linking to some mp3 sermons on head coverings (1 Cor. 11:1-16) . I listened to one by R.C. Sproul, “To Cover or Not to Cover”. Some thoughts…
- There are commands in the Bible that are difficult to interpret and when you find this you also find significantly sized groups which represent the competing positions. For example, there are groups which baptize infants and groups which only baptize adults. There are seemingly good arguments for both positions and that is why you find groups which reflect both ends of the spectrum in practice.
- I believe the command for women to wear head coverings is just such a command. There are arguments for and against interpreting the relevant passage as being presently applicable. However, in this case the number of groups which presently encourage the wearing of head coverings and the number of women who actually practice this is astonishingly small.
- I say astonishingly small because I believe that if a thousand people untainted by modern culture and scholarship were to study the relevant passages that more than half would come out in support of head coverings. Maybe I am wrong and it would be significantly less, but the present reality is that this number is probably less than 2% at best (astonishing).
- This leads me to think that very few Christians have ever really struggled with these verses. Instead they have taken their queues from the culture or simply done what is easiest which is to look around and do what everyone else is doing.
- R.C. implies that the rejection of head coverings is historically recent and coincided with cultural shifts in views of the roles of men and women. This affirms the statement that we are taking our queues from the culture.
- Not going to dwell here but I think there is some applicability that can be made here in regards to forms of dress and which are and are not appropriate for worship for both men and women.
- I am certain (if I were a women) I would be compelled to wear a head covering during worship. This would not be an easy thing to do given no one else within our present circle does. I believe that the pressure to conform within the church is even greater on this particular issue than the pressure which comes from outside the church. That is a shame.
- How should the church handle this particular issue? I think churches should be clear that these passages are not perhaps as “clear” as our modern practices reflect. They should encourage men and women to reevaluate Paul’s commands and give them the freedom to comply as they are led to do so. The site of a women wearing a head covering should not be the cause of gasps and stares.
My wife and I discussed this topic at lunch today and a few more thoughts came up which I am adding below to the original post.
- Until today I thought “hair” could equal “head covering”. I can’t believe I missed this before but verse 6 makes this idea impossible. If head covering meant hair it would read “For if a woman will not cover her head (with hair), she should cut off her hair.” This does not effect the cultural argument against head coverings but it is still a mistake to read it this way and once I cleared that up I had to deal with argument of culturally relevancy. In the past I avoided the argument because I assumed it did not matter as long as woman had a tad more hair than G.I. Jane.
- We (Christians) tend to dismiss what we think to be small things in the Bible. The cultural argument against head coverings focuses on the sizable implications head coverings might have had within the Corinthian church and argue that no such implications are relevant today. I don’t agree. As a mental exercise try imagining a world in which you wake up tomorrow and most Christian woman begin to wear head coverings (at least during worship). This would draw scorn from the world. We would be mocked on late night TV. Oprah would interview psychologists about the negative effects head coverings have on self esteem. Many women would perhaps refuse to wear them because of the shame it brings, not from those within the church but from the culture. In fact I am sure many would refuse to step foot into any church which even adhered to such a practice. We would see a return to more modest standards of dress (in church at least). A head covering is not only a symbol of submission but a symbol of modesty. It marks the wearer publicly as one of God’s children. The cultural argument for head coverings is as strong today as it was in the days of Paul.
- Another thought exercise here. I encourage you to try to imagine as you read that Paul handed down a copy of these commands to Timothy. They eventually end up in the hands of Timothy’s grandson and on his deathbed he bequeaths the them to you. The purpose here is to try to connect you in time to the author of these texts. It is harder to be convinced by the cultural argument if you can see that there isn’t really that vast difference between 100 years and 2000 years. My thinking is that if the scenario above were true I would have a greater inclination to believe the commands were still presently applicable.
- Where do you need to go to find woman wearing head coverings? Your best chance is going to be some Fundamentalists, a few very Reformed folk, or the Anabaptists (like the Amish). If you think about these groups one aspect that they have in common is that typically make attempts to reject the influence of the culture. This is evidence that instead of actually being convicted by scripture we are actually”taking our queues from the culture”.